SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 278

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Azad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Resham Bhargava, for Appellants G.S. Rathore, PP for State

Honble SHARMA, J.–The appellants were accused on the file of learned Sessions Judge, Ajmer in Sessions Case No. 4/96. They were convicted for the offence u/s 8/20 and 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short `the NDPS Act, 1985), and sentenced to undergo 10 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1.00 lacs and in default to further undergo additional imprisonment of two years vide Judgment dated August 12th 1998. Against this Judgment that the present action of filing the appeal has been resorted to by the appellants.

(2). According to the prosecution story, the SHO Manglyawas (Ajmer) received secret information on April 20, 1996 to which the SHO alongwith the other police constables rushed at the spot where accused-appellants were searched and Charas weighing 950 grams were found from the possession of accused-Azad Singh, whereas Charas weighing 480 grams and Opium weighing 130 grams were recovered from accused Jaipal Singh.

(3). Necessary memos were drawn by the investigating officer and after completion of investigation charge sheet was filed. Charges u/S. 8/20 & 8/18 of the NDPS Act were framed against the accused appellants. They denied the charge















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top