Honble SETHI, J.–The Constitutional validity of Section 32A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ``the Act) is under challenge in these petitions filed by the convicts of the offences under the Act. The section is alleged to be arbitrary, discriminating and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India which creates unreasonable distinction between the prisoners convicted under the Act and the prisoners convicted for the offence punishable under various other statutes. It is submitted that the Legislature is not competent to take away, by statutory prohibition, the judicial function of the Court in the matter of deciding as to whether after the conviction under the Act the sentence can be suspended or not. The Section is further assailed on the ground that it has negated the statutory provisions of Sections 389, 432 and 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ``the Code) in the matter of deciding as to whether after the conviction under the Act the sentence can be suspended, remitted or commented or not and also under what circumstances, restrictions or limitations on the suspension of senten

Click Here to Read the rest of this document