SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 560

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH, N.N.MATHUR
Bhopal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.D. Rajpurohit, for Petitioner

Honble MATHUR, J.–By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, first and second petitioners, the parents of deceased Dr. Bhanwar Singh, who is alleged to have been murdered on 15.3.1987, has challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 225, 301 and 302 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They claim right to conduct the prosecution against the accused persons by a lawyer of their choice and not by a Public Prosecutor appointed under a spoil system.

(2). The few facts in the context of which petitioners claim right to conduct trial are as follows:

The third petitioner, brother of deceased Dr. Bhanwar Singh, lodged a FIR at Police Station. Takhatgarh, District Pali, on 17.3.1987 against Prithvi Raj, Ghanshyam Singh, Bakhtawar Singh. Ladu Singh and one Shri Keshav Singh for the offences u/ss 302, 147, 148, 149 IPC. The police registered FIR No. 18/1987 and proceeded with investigation. After investigation, police submitted a Final Report expressing the opinion that deceased Bhanwar Singh died in an accident. This was not accepted by the complainant party and, therefore, a protest petition was filed in the court of M.J.M. Sumerpur. The learned Magistrate directed fo


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top