N.N.MATHUR, AMRESH KUMAR SINGH
Mohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Lal Chand – Respondent
``1. Whether provision for special Appeals can be said to substitute of letters patent after enforcement of the Constitution?
2. Whether special Appeal is maintainable only against those matters which originally originate in the High Court with an avowed object to check and balance?
3. Whether provision relating to life of an ordinance enshrined under Government of India Act 1935 and thereafter under the Constitution are applicable to the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance 1949. If so, its effect in filing Special Appeals after expiry of six months from the date of issuance of Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949?
4. Whether Special Appeals can be filed under Section 18 of Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 even in those proceedings and suits which originate in subordinate civil courts or tribunals against which writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution?
5. Whether Special Appeals under Section 18 of Rajastha
1. State vs. Babulal (AIR 1957 Raj. 28 = 1957 RLW 52)
2. Sardaria vs. Board of Revenue (AIR 1954 Raj. 224)
3. Anandi Lal vs. State of Rajasthan (1996(2) WLC P 36 = RLW 1996(1) Raj. 396).–Followed.
4. Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. vs. Industrial Tribunal
8. Sukhlal vs. Revenue Board Rajasthan (1954 RLW 152)
9. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Santosh (1995(1) RLR 584 )
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.