SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 808

Rajasthan High Court
Honble SUNIL KUMAR GARG, J.
Ramphal - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 274 of 1998
Decided On : November 14, 2000

Advocates Appeared:
D.S. Shishodia, Sr. Advocate with H.L. Kela, for Appellant D.D. Kalla, Public Prosecutor

Headnote:Evidence Act, 1872, Sec. 32 and Penal Code Sec. 306 & 498 – Dying declaration – Commission of suicide – Subjected cruelty by husband – No certificate by the Doctor stating fit condition of the injured – Deceased suffered 100% burn injury – Recording of dying declaration by Magistrate in the presence of doctor who made endorsement that the patient was conscious and in a State of giving statement – Trial Court presumed suicide abetted – Relied upon dying declaration – Converted u/S. 306 – Held – Dying declaration duly recorded by the Executive Magistrate with endorsement by the doctor that the patient was in condition of giving statement can be relied upon – Confirmed the findings of the trial court. (Paras 57, 69, 76, 79, 86 & 87)

       

Honble GARG, J.–The abovenamed accused appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 18.2.1998 passed by the learned Judge, Special Court (Women Atrocities & Dowry Cases), Bhilwara in Sessions Case No. 229/97, by which he acquitted the accused appellant of the charge under Section 498A IPC, but convicted him under section 306 IPC and sentenced to undergo seven years RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo six months SI.

(2). The facts giving rise to this appeal, in short, are as follows:-

On 28.12.1994 (from 5.15 PM to 6.00 PM), PW 5 Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, A.D.M. Bhilwara recorded the statement of Smt. Chandrakala (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) W/o Ramphal (accused appellant), aged 17 years, resident of 3E-19, New Housing Board, Shastri Nagar Bhilwara, in the MG Hospital, Bhilwara, in which she stated as follows:-

1. That deceased was married with Ramphal (accused appellant) before four years back and out of four years, she has remained at her parents house for three years and she has one child.

2. That her husband used to come to house after taking liquor and thereafter, her husband used to torture and humiliate her and for the last four months, she was in her parents house and she came on 20.12.1994 to her in-laws house and her husband (accused appellant) promised to her father PW 3 Ramavtar that accused appellant would keep her properly and happily. But, thereafter also, her husband (accused appellant) used to come to house after taking liquor and make quarrel, harass and humiliate her and, therefore, she wanted to die and her Jeth also abetted.

3. That her son, after her death, be handed over to her parents and her dead body be also handed over to her parents and age of her son is one year six months.

4. That when she put fire on her body, accused appellant was there, but he did not save her.

(3). On this report, police registered the case and started investigation and on the same day, deceased died at about 10.10 PM. After death, post mortem of her dead body was got conducted on 29.12.1994 through Medical Board and the post mortem report is Ex. P/5, where the cause of her death opined by the Medical Board is that she died of shock which could be because of 100% burn on all parts of body. The panchayatnama of the dead body of the deceased is Ex.P/1. The site plan is Ex.P/2. The fard of seizure of stove with kerosene, clothes and slipper etc. is Ex.P/3. Thereafter, accused appellant was arrested.

(4). After usual investigation, police submitted challan against the accused appellant in the Court of Magistrate and from where the case was committed to the Court of Session and, thereafter, the case was transferred to the Special Court (Women Atrocities & Dowry Cases), Bhilwara.

(5). The learned Trial Judge on 14.5.1997 framed charges u/S. 498A and 306 IPC against the accused appellant. The charges were read over and explained to the accused appellant, who pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

(6). In support of its case, the prosecution examined as many as seven witnesses and got exhibited several documents. Thereafter, statement of the accused appellant u/S. 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded, where he took the following plea:-

**eSaus ifRu dks u rks tyk;k u mls rax fd;k] eSaus rks mYVk oks ty xbZ Fkh rks cpk;k FkkA o eSa Lo;a 40 izfrkr ty x;k FkkA^^

(7). No evidence in defence was produced. However, some documents were got exhibited by accused appellant in defence.

(8) After conclusion of trial, the learned Judge, Special Court (Women Atrocities & Dowry Cases), Bhilwara through his judgment and order dated 18.12.1998 acquitted the accused appellant of the charge under section 498A IPC, but convicted him under section 306 IPC and sentenced in the manner as stated above holding inter-alia:-

1. That when dying declaration of the deceased Ex.P/4 was recorded by PW 5 Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, ADM on 28.12.1994, deceased was in a fit state of mind to give the said statemen































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top