ARUN MADAN
Harish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). Facts relevant for disposal of this petition, in brief, are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Constable on 1.12.1973 by the Superintendent of Police (S.P.) Jaipur and later on was transferred to the office of S.P. Sikar in January, 1987. During his posting as Constable in Treasury Guard, Sikar on 12.5.91; as per charge sheet dated 21.8.91, the petitioner is alleged to have left place of his duty (Treasury Guard) alongwith a register but in a drunkard condition had proceeded to the office of S.P. Sikar alongwith his rifle, inasmuch as he ill-behaved with officials deployed in election duty in his drunkard state on the way and thereafter entered in the chambers of the S.P. The charge-sheet is said to have been served on 24.8.91 and whereafter the Addl. S.P. was appointed as Enquiry Officer who during inquiry is said to have informed the delinquent (petitioner) as to the inquiry dates on various occasions through special messangers
2. Ramchander vs. Union of India (AIR 1986 SC 1173)
3. B.C. Chaturvedi vs. Union of India (AIR 1996 SC 484)
1. Vasudeo K. Hardasani vs. State of Rajasthan (1989(1) RLR 99).-Followed.
4. Suresh Kumar Chugh vs. State (1997(1) RLR 315 = RLW 1997(1) Raj. 383)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.