SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 291

ARUN MADAN
Harish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K. Sharma, for Petitioner M.A. Khan, for Respondents

Honble MADAN, J.–In second inning of his legal battle the petitioner has challenged impugned orders dt.13.1.94 (Annex.4) dismissing him from service for the misconduct and which has been affirmed in his appeal by order dt.29.7.94 (Annex.6).

(2). Facts relevant for disposal of this petition, in brief, are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Constable on 1.12.1973 by the Superintendent of Police (S.P.) Jaipur and later on was transferred to the office of S.P. Sikar in January, 1987. During his posting as Constable in Treasury Guard, Sikar on 12.5.91; as per charge sheet dated 21.8.91, the petitioner is alleged to have left place of his duty (Treasury Guard) alongwith a register but in a drunkard condition had proceeded to the office of S.P. Sikar alongwith his rifle, inasmuch as he ill-behaved with officials deployed in election duty in his drunkard state on the way and thereafter entered in the chambers of the S.P. The charge-sheet is said to have been served on 24.8.91 and whereafter the Addl. S.P. was appointed as Enquiry Officer who during inquiry is said to have informed the delinquent (petitioner) as to the inquiry dates on various occasions through special messangers























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top