SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1097

N.N.MATHUR, O.P.BISHNOI
Sushila Nagar – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jodhpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mahesh Bora,for Petitioner

Honble MATHUR, J.–By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks to quash the memo dated 28.7.2001, whereby she has been informed that an enquiry is proposed to be held against her under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958, hereinafter referred-to as `the CCA Rules.

(2). Petitioner Smt. Sushila Nagar is officer in the cadre of Rajasthan Judicial Service. She was served with a memo of chargesheet dated 30.10.2000 alongwith the Statement of Allegation under the signatures of Honble the Enquiry Judge. The case against the petitioner as set out in the Statement of Allegations is that the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) cum Judicial Magistrate, I Class, Pali, by order dated 23.05.1986 directed to release tractor bearing No. RSY 8389 to one Shri Mahaveer Chand. Another claimant of tractor filed a review application, which was rejected by order dt. 30.6.88. The revisional Court set aside the order of the learned Magistrate by order dated 30.04.1993 and directed to decide the application for disposal of the tractor after hearing all the concerned parties. This order was challenged before









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top