H.S.PUNIA, RASHMI PRIYADARSHINI
Murti Mandir – Appellant
Versus
Ram Charan – Respondent
(2). The brief facts, necessary for decision of this appeal, are that a revenue suit for declaration of khatedari rights and permanent injunction was filed by the Villagers on behalf of appellants No. 1 & 2 with the averment that the plaintiffs are khatedar tenants of agriculture land bearing Khasra No. 231, 232, 235 to 241, 469, 507, 508 and 509 measuring 41.13 bighas situated in the precinct of Village Rampura Patan and this land was given as muafi to both the temples and it was khudkast land of the plaintiffs-appellants. The defendants- respondents No.1 to 3 were pujaris of both the idols and they were managing the worship and cultivation of the suit land of the deities, and also the suit land was in possession of the Pujaris on behalf of the deities. It was further stated that the defendants took undue advantage of their position an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.