A.C.GOYAL, Y.R.MEENA
Harphool and Ram Jeewan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal are in brief that P.W. 4 Prabhu Dayal, brother of the deceased Kailash submitted a written report Ex.P.8, at Police Station Malakhera, district Alwar, on 2.10.1994, at 2.15 p.m. with the averments that at about 10 a.m. his brother Kailash was going to house of Ramji Lal from his Well. On the way in the village Bader Ka Bas, accused appellants Harphool and his son Ramjeewan armed respectively with Kulhari and Tanchia, assaulted Kailash. Kailash ran away for his life and rushed to the roof of the house of Sohan Lal. Both the assailants followed him there. Accused Ramjeewan inflicted injuries with Tanchia on ear, nose, eyes, while accused Harphool caused injury on head by Kulhari. This occurrence was witnessed by Mangal Ram (PW.7), Babu Lal (PW. 6), Laxman (PW. 5) and Faiju Khan. Both the accused ran away and Kailash died instantaneously.
(3). On the basis of thi
1. Nathuni Yadav and others vs. State of Bihar (AIR 1997 SC 1808)
2. State of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Hazara Singh and another (AIR 1981 SC 451).–Followed.
3. Ishwar Singh vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1976 SC 2423)
4. Ashok Kumar vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1977 SC 109)
5. Ram Lal vs. Delhi Administration (AIR 1972 SC 2462)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.