Honble SINGH, J.–The three appellants herein were tried by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Vidisha, M.P. in Sessions Trial No.76 of 1992 charged of offences u/Sec. 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; Sec. 376(2)(G) and Sec. 506 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that they had, on 4.3.1992, committed gang rape and criminally intimidated Kumari Lusia a tribal woman, who was posted as Assistant Teacher in the Primary Government School at Village Bagod. The trial Court acquittal them of the charge under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 but found them guilty of the offence u/Sec. 376(2)(G) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,000/- each under that section. It further found them guilty of the offence u/Sec. 506 Part 11 of the Indian Penal Code for which they were sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment. Aggrieved by the judgment and order of the trial Court, the appellant Malkhansingh preferred Criminal Appeal No.49 of 1997 while the other two appellants filed Criminal Appeal No.76 of 1997 before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. The High Court by its impugned judgment and order of 11.3.2002 dismissed the appeals. The appellants have preferred these two appeals by special leave.

(2). The case of the prosecution is that the prosecutrix Kumari Lusia was working as Assistant Teacher in the Government Primary School at village Bagod. She was aged about 28 years and was unmarried. On 4.3.1992 at about 11.30 a.m. she boarded a bus to go to Bagod and alighted from the bus at about 1.00 p.m. at a place known as Zero Chain Puliya from where her school was located at a distance of about 1 kilometer. After alighting from the bus she proceeded on foot to the school in village Bagod. When she was near the tapara of Baldar Khan she noticed that she was being followed by three persons. When she proceed some distance she suspected that some of them had come very close to her. She moved to the edge of the path-way giving way to the persons behind her to go ahead. However, one of them, later identified as appellant-Maharajsingh, caught hold of her hands from behind. The prosecutrix objected and raised an alarm calling out for Baldar Khan but no one came to her rescue. On the other hand appellant-Malkhansingh took out a knife and threatened her. Appellant-Musab Khan also took out a knife and threatened her into silence. Two of them then dragged her towards the canal where she was further threatened and made to lie on the ground. When again she persisted in raising alarm, appellant-Maharajsingh placed a knife on her neck and tried to press her neck. Thereafter the appellants-Musab Khan and Malkhansingh removed her clothes and Musab Khan was the first person to sexually assault her followed by Maharajsingh and Malkhansingh. Thereafter they let her giving threats of dire consequences if she reported the matter to the police and reminded her that she would meet the same fate, which Madam Rekha had met, if she reported the matter to the police.

(3). After the occurrence the prosecutrix left for her home at Bagod and went to school at about 3.00 p.m. On the next day she attended the school but thereafter went to Vidisha accompanied by another teacher Mangalsingh, At Vidisha she met the Deputy Director of Education, one Mr. Dutta, on 6.3.1992 to whom she narrated the incident and told him that the three boys were after her life and it was not safe for her to go back to Bagod. She requested that she may be transferred to some other school. According to the prosecutrix, Mr. Dutta attached her to a school at Khamkheda with effect from 10.3.1992. She narrated the incident to her colleague Shri Mangalsingh on 12.3.1992, who in turn reported the matter to Kaluram, PW-3, who was the President of District Teachers Association. On 14.3.1992 Shri Kaluram, PW-3, took her to the residenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document