SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1007

ARUN MADAN
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajeet Kumar Sharma, for Petitioner Manish Bhandari, for Respondents

Honble MADAN, J.–This writ petition arises out of an order of removal of the petitioner from service duly upheld by the appellate Authority (respondents) in disciplinary inquiry initiated for the charges as to the absence from head quarter station at Shamgarh (Kota) and overstay permitted ten days during the period of suspension.

(2). In nut shell, the facts relevant for the present controversy are thus:-

After completion of initial training course from 15.12.86 to 14.7.87 and further practical training from 15.7.87 to 14.8.87, the petitioner was appointed as Constable and then confirmed as such. However, he was placed under suspension in contemplation of a disciplinary inquiry by suspension order dated 15.1.90 (Annex.1), whereby he was directed to report his attendance daily at Kota (W) but with a specific condition that he is not permitted to leave his headquarter during suspension without permission of the competent authority since otherwise he will be liable to the taken up for necessary disciplinary actin under RPF Rules. By subsequent order dated 19.3.90 the Divisional Security Commissioner (RPF) Kota (respondent No.3) shifted headquarter of the petitioner from Kota to Shyamgar




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top