ARUN MADAN
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
(2). In nut shell, the facts relevant for the present controversy are thus:-
After completion of initial training course from 15.12.86 to 14.7.87 and further practical training from 15.7.87 to 14.8.87, the petitioner was appointed as Constable and then confirmed as such. However, he was placed under suspension in contemplation of a disciplinary inquiry by suspension order dated 15.1.90 (Annex.1), whereby he was directed to report his attendance daily at Kota (W) but with a specific condition that he is not permitted to leave his headquarter during suspension without permission of the competent authority since otherwise he will be liable to the taken up for necessary disciplinary actin under RPF Rules. By subsequent order dated 19.3.90 the Divisional Security Commissioner (RPF) Kota (respondent No.3) shifted headquarter of the petitioner from Kota to Shyamgar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.