SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 919

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench
Honble S.K. KESHOTE & F.C. BANSAL, JJ.
Anwar Ali - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 829 of 1998
Decided On : July 30, 2002

Advocates Appeared:
P.R.S. Rajawat, for Accused Appellant S.S. Rathore, Public Prosecutor for State

Headnote:Cr.P.C., 1973, Sec. 311; Power of the Court to re- examine any person already examined – Summoned the wife of the deceased, eye witness in a murder case as a witness in defence in absence of Public Prosecutor – Held – Court can exercise its power u/S. 311 only for just decision of the case – It doesnt empower the court to permit the prosecution witness to be examined as a defence witness – It will result in acquittal of many unscrupulous accused by way of their muscle power money power or other influence.

       The court is not empowered to call the prosecution witness whose statements have already been recorded, as a defence witness but otherwise also that learned trial court has not recorded any reason in support of its order dated 16.10.1998 permitting the accused appellant to produce the complainant, who was a prosecution witness and her statements had already been recorded, as a defence witness. (Para 32)

Honble KESHOTE, J.–This appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed by Anwar Ali son of Ramjani, residence of Gardana, Tesil, Sangod, Police Station, Kanwas, District Kota, at present in Central Jail, Kota against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 05th of November, 1998 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ramganj Mandi, in Session Case No. 143/1998. The Additional Session Judge, Ramganj Mandi under the judgment of conviction and sentence convicted the accused appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,000/-., in default of payment of fine the accused appellant has to undergo further six months simple imprisonment. The accused appellant has also been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act and was sentenced to undergo one years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo further one month simple imprisonment.

(2). The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ramganj mandi has ordered to run the sentences concurrently.

(3). The facts of the prosecution case in nut shell, is that on 22.6.1995 Mst. Firoz Bano, (PW.4) lodged a written report at Police Station, Kanwas stating therein that her husband Talib Hussain and Anwar Hussain are real brothers. Both the brothers are having ten bighas of land in Village, Gardana. The land of the Village, Gardana is with Anwar and mother in-law of the complainant namely, Smt. Jenab. Her husband is having there bighas of the land in the Village, Islam Nagar and 1 & 1/2 bighas in the Village Kandafal, which are on mortgaged. Her husband is working in `Ravtha Khan. The complainant and her husband are leaving separately form them. Her mother in-law and Anwar (thewar) are residing together separately from them though in the same house having separate rooms in their possession.

(4). About 4-5 days, before the date of incidence, her mother in- law told to Anwar that he is not doing any work and she will not give him meals. On this point, Anwar has told to her that she has been poisoned against him by the elder brother i.e. the husband of the complaint. The mother in-law told to him that his elder brother, the husband of complaint has not poisoned her against him. She (complainant) was sleeping on the cot. Anwar has abused her and inflicted injury on her hand by `Purania. She has come out from the house. Anwar has inflicted injury on the thigh of the left leg by `Purania. Asraf Ali, Pegmber Sahib had intervened in the matter and save her from attack of Anwar. Her husband has come to house at 2.00 p.m. on 21.6.1995. She had narrated the story of her beating by Talib Hussain to husband. Talib Hussain told that is the matter of relations of her with brother-in-law. The husband of complaint told to Anwar he has not done good to beat his wife. He asked him to come at home, but he (accused) has not come to home. Anwar has gone to Anuddin, who is real uncle of complainant to complaint against her husband. Anuddin talk to her husband and told that he will not fight with him. He may come and live peacefully in house. Anwar has not returned to home in night. In the morning on 22.6.1995, he had come at about 6.00 AM, when she was preparing `Khir.

(5). Part of the original of this document is torn. From readable part of this document, we find that there was talking between the brothers for some money. Anwar has gone out telling to his brother that he may remain in the house. Thereafter at about 7.00 am, he came with Gun and fired on her husband, who was sitting on the cot i.e. fire hit to her husband at his abdomen, chest and head. After some time her husband is died. Anwar has ran away with the Gun from the scene of incidence. At the time of this incidence at her house nobody was present except herself and her mother-in-law.

(6). Having gone through the file of the court below we fin






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top