Honble GOYAL, J.–This is first appeal by the defendants challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.2.1992 whereby learned Additional District Judge, Kishangarhbas decreed the plaintiffs suit. The parties in this appeal shall be referred as arrayed in the plaint.

(2). The plaintiff Sh. Kashiram (since deceased) filed a suit on 26.2.1986 for cancellation of a gift deed dated 20.6.1977 and for declaration that the defendant No. 1 Sh. Virendra Singh is not the adopted son of the plaintiff with the averments that agricultural land measuring 15 beeghas 5 biswas as mentioned in para 1 of the plaint and agricultural land measuring 16 & half beeghas as mentioned in para 2 of the plaint is in Khatedari and in possession of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is having three daughters-all married and his wife. The defendants Virendra Singh and his father Deen Dayal are also residents of village Bheekhawas. The defendant No. 2 Sh. Deen Dayal is an advocate and on account of his contracts with the plaintiff, the plaintiff developed his confidence in defendant No. 2. Both the defendants in conspiracy approached the plaintiff and stated that the plaintiff is having about 32 beeghas of land and in case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document