ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K.THAKKER
Poonam Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
Fazru – Respondent
(2). Brief reference to the factual aspects as contended by the appellant would suffice.
(3). Respondent-Fazru (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) filed a complaint no. 152 on 10.7.1992 which was dismissed by order dated 13.1.1994 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nuh, Haryana. On 12.2.1996 the complainant filed a revision before the Punjab and Haryana High Court which was numbered as Criminal Revision No. 43 of 1995. The said revision petition was dismissed by order dated 12.2.1996. Prior to the institution of a complaint 4 suits had been filed by the appellants companies and other appellants in 1989 which were decreed by order dated 24.10.1997. In all these cases complainant-Fazru was defendant no.l. In 1992 the complainant filed a Civil Suit No. 90 of 1992 in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nuh. The same was dismissed for default on 7.10.1997. Complainant filed the complaint which forms subject matter of present appeal no.
1. Pramatha Nath Taluqdar vs. Saroj Ranjan Sarkar (AIR 1962 SC 876)
12. Mahesh Chand vs. B. Janardhan Reddy and another (2003(1) SCC 734)
15. K.M. Mathew vs. State of Kerala and Another (1992(1) SCC 217)
17. K. K. Patel and Another vs. State of Gujarat and Another (2000(6) SCC 195)
13. Subramanium Sethuraman vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. (2004 (6) Supreme 662)
14. Adalat Prasad vs. Rooplal Jindal and others (2004 (7) Scale 137)
19. Madhu Limaye vs. State of Maharashtra (1978 (1) SCR 749)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.