SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, K.S.RATHORE, SHASHI KANT SHARMA
Ramesh Chand Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent
``Whether intra court appeal to the Division Bench is maintainable against the order/judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India?
SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION
(2). In our endeavour to answer the question, we may begin with noticing that the power of superintending control conferred by Article 227 of the Constitution is similar to the control exercised by the Court of Kings Bench over the inferior Courts of England under the Common Law. The history of Article 227 and its scope were considered by the Apex Court in Waryam Singh vs. Amarnath (1), and it was indicated that the material part of Article 227 substantially reproduces the provisions of Section 107 of Government of india Act 1915, except that the power of superintendence has been extended by the Article also to tribunals.
The history of Article 227 suggests that the framers of our Constitution believed that they were restoring to the High Court the power which had been taken away by Section 224(2) of Government of India Act, 1935. In the original Constituti
6. Mani Nariman Daruwala vs. Phiroz N. Bhatena (AIR 1991 SC 1494)
14. Sushila Bai Laxminarayan Mudliyar vs. Nihal Chand (AIR 1992 SC 185)
15. Ratnagir D.C. Cooperative Bank vs. Dinkar Kashinath Watve (1993 Supp.(1) SCC 9)
23. Mangalbhai vs. Dr. Radheyshyam (1992 (3) SCC 448)
1. Waryam Singh vs. Amarnath ((1954) SCR 565)
2. Baby vs. Travancore Devaswom Board ((1998) 8 SCC 310)
3. Achutananda Vadya vs. Prafullya Kumar Gayen and Others ((1997)5 SCC 76)
4. Surya Dev Rai vs. Ramchandra Rai and Others ((2003) 6 SCC 675 = RLW 2003(4) SC 523)
5. Sadhana Lodh vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. ((2003) 3 SCC 524)
7. State vs. Navjot Sandhu ((2003) 6 SCC 641)
8. Shiv Shakti Co-operative Housing Society vs. Swaraj Developers ((2003)6 SCC 659)
16. Lokmat News Papers vs. Shankar Prasad ((1999)6 SCC 275)
17. Anandi Lal vs. State (AIR 1996 Rajasthan 154 = RLW 1996(1) Raj. 396)
18. Mohal Lal vs. Lal Chand (2001(1) WLC (Raj.) 129 = RLW 2000(4) Raj. 142)
19. Punjab National Bank vs. Purewell (2002(1) WLC (Raj.) 67 = RLW 2002(2) Raj. 963)
22. Baddula Lakshmaiah vs. Sri Anjaneya Swami Temple ((1996)3 SCC 52)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.