SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 2776

Rajasthan High Court
Honble H.R. PANWAR, J.
Kailash - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1205 of 2003
Decided On : December 05, 2005

Advocates Appeared:
B.S. Rathore, for Appellant Kailash Sandeep Mehta with Dharmendra Surana, for Appellant-Petitioner Suresh Kumar J.P.S. Choudhary, Public Prosecutor for State

Headnote:(a) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Sec. 8/20 – Lack of evidence of preparing specimen seal and sending to F.S.L. – Held – When there is no evidence of preparing specimen seal and sending to F.S.L., in view of missing of link evidence the entire prosecution becomes doubtful and the accused is entitled to be acquitted. (Paras 10 to 17)(b) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Sec. 60, 63 – Passing order of confiscation of vehicle seized while carrying contraband Ganja without hearing its driver – Held – Before passing order of confiscation procedure provided under Sec. 60 and 63 of the Act is required to be followed – In absence of serving notice or affording opportunity of hearing, the order is liable to be set aside – Matter remanded. (Paras 19 & 20)

       

Honble PANWAR, J.–These two criminal appeals under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short `the Code hereinafter) and Criminal Revision No. 1151/2003 are directed against the judgment and order dated 23.9.2003 passed by Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Cases, Churu (for short `the Trial Court hereinafter) in Special Sessions Case No. 01/2003 whereby the Trial Court convicted both the appellants Kailash and Suresh Kumar for the offence under Section 8/20 of the Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short `the N.D.P.S. Act hereinafter) and sentenced each of them to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- each, a default of payment of fine to further undergo two years rigorous imprisonment. The Trial Court further directed confiscation of the Maruti Car No. R.J. 18-C-4828 which was registered in the name of revisionist Suresh Kumar. Aggrieved by the judgment and order impugned as also confiscation of the aforesaid Maruti Car, both the appellants have filed the instant two separate criminal appeals and petitioner Suresh Kumar has filed the instant revision petition.

(2). Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on 5.2.2003, PW-6 Ranveer Singh, Station House Officer, Ratan Nagar received a secret information telephonically at 6.00 PM that a while coloured Maruti Car bearing No. R.J. 18-C-4828 loaded with Ganja is coming from Fatehpur to Churu side. The said information was reduced to writing vide Ex.P-13. The secret information Ex.P-13 was sent to the Supdt. of Police and Circle Officer, Churu. PW-6 Ranveer Singh SHO Ratan Nagar along with police personnel namely PW-4 Dharmpal Singh H.C., constables PW-7 Virendra Singh, PW-8 Ramnarayan, PW-2 Ranveer Singh and PW-10 Shivbhagvan driver of the Jeep started from the police station and reached Ratan Nagar town, where from, he took two Motbirs PW-1 Kisan Kumar and PW-3 Dilip Singh. The Motbirs were served with notice Ex.P-1 and Ex.P- 7 respectively for obtaining their consent and they consented to be the Motbirs in writing on the aforesaid notices. Thereafter, PW-6 Ranveer Singh along with police party and Motbirs reached Onkar Ashram near Churu-Ramgarh Road, Ratan Nagar and started arranging Nakabandi. At about 7.15 A.M., while Nakabandi, a while coloured Maruti Car bearing No. R.J.18-C-4828 came from Ramgarh side. The Car was got stopped. On being asked, the driver of the said Car disclosed his name as Suresh Kumar S/o Nandlal R/o Surajgarh, the present appellant and other person who was found sitting by the side of accused appellant Suresh Kumar disclosed his name as Kailash S/o Hariprasad R/o Fatehpur, district Sikar appellant in Cr. Appeal No. 1205/2003. The appellants were given notice purporting to be under Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act vide Ex.P-3 and Ex.P-4. They were given option whether they be searched in presence of nearest Magistrate or Gazetted Officer or by concerned S.H.O. They expressed their option and agreed for the search of their own and the Car by the S.H.O. concerned i.e., PW-6 Both the appellants gave consent in writing to be searched by S.H.O. On the Car being checked, it was found carrying 12 bundles of Ganga, each bundles weighing 16 kg. totaling to 194 Kg. and 850 Gram. From each of the bundles, 250 grams of contraband Ganja was taken as sample in plastic bags and the plastic bags of samples were sealed on the spot. The remaining contraband Ganja was also sealed on the spot. Both the appellants were found carrying contraband Ganja without licence or permit. After usual investigation, police filed challan against the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

(3). Before the Trial Court the prosecution produced as many as 10 witnesses and tendered in evidence documents Ex.P-1 to Ex.P- 43. Accused appellants made statement under Section 313 of the Code and denied allegation and produced as many as six witnesses in defence as also tendered in evidence documen




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top