R.S.CHAUHAN
Om Prakash Taneja – Appellant
Versus
Saraogi Mansion Estate Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
(2). The appellant is challenging the Order dated 9.12.2003, passed by the Additional District Judge, No. 8, Jaipur, whereby the learned Judge has fixed the provisional rent of the showroom at Rs. 57,500/- per month and has directed the appellant to pay the said amount to the respondent from 16.4.2001, the date of the filing of the suit under Section 6 of the Act.
(3). The brief facts of the case are that the landlord, the respondent before this Court, had filed a suit under Section 6 for fixation of standard rent for the showroom rented by the appellant. According to the plaint, the Saraogi Mansion is a commercial building situated on M.I. Road of Jaipur the main artery of Jaipur. The appellant wanted t
Dr. Balbir Singh and Others vs. M/s. M.C.D. and Others (AIR 1985 SC 339) 6
Raymond Synthetics Ltd. vs. Union of India (AIR 1992 SC 847) 7
M/s. Shah & Co. vs. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1967 SC 1877) 11
Gian Devi vs. Jeevan Kumar (AIR 1985 SC 796) 11
V.N. Vasudeva vs. Kirori Mal Luhariwala (AIR 1965 SC 440)–Followed. 28
Union of India & Anr. vs. Parvati Devi (RLW 2004 (3) Raj. 1828) 7
Dharamveer Kaliya vs. Kham Singh & Ors. (1982 (1) RCJ 599) 7
Hari Rawji Gore Sastri vs. The Malabar District Board (AIR 1951 Mad. 493) 7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.