Honble CHAUHAN, J.–The appellant-a poor widow-is pitted against the former Maharaja of Kota-the respondent before this Court. She seeks the refuge of this Court in order to protect her alleged property from the Maharajas muscle men. She is challenging the Order dated 28.1.06, passed by the Additional District Judge, No. 1, Kota whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the appellants second temporary injunction application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code (henceforth to be referred to as `the Code, for short).

(2). The factual matrix of the case is rather chequered. According to the appellant, her late husband used to be a ``Poddar of the Late Maharao Bhim Singhji of Kota, (henceforth to be referred to as `the Late Maharao, for short), the father of the Respondent No. 1. The post of ``Poddar used to be an office of status and confidence in the State times. It seems in 1980, agricultural land belonging to the Late Maharao, situated in Khasra No. 433, 434, 436 to 487, 491, 498/684 and 546/691, all measuring about 80 bighas, situated in Village Rampura, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota was given to the appellants husband for cultivation. With the end of the princely

Click Here to Read the rest of this document