R.N.ARVIND
Girdhar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent
2. Both the references were decided by one order and since the subject matter of the review is same with both the petitions; hence both the review petitions are being decided by one order. Copies of this order may be placed in each file.
3. By the review petitions a special emphasise has been made on the fact that the decision of the Cabinet dated 14.9.49 has not been properly interpreted and it has been argued that the land connected with Prem Kunj is part of Prem Kunj and it cannot be treated as a separate government land. Learned counsel for the petitioners also argued that the connected land was accepted as a private property. He also argued that the references were presented after a long lapse of six years and as such this is an error apparent on the face of the record and these cases need to be reviewed because the order passed by this Bench is erroneous and there is error apparent on the face of the record and position of facts and law has not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.