SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1813

R.N.ARVIND
Girdhar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Mukesh Jain, Counsel, for Petitioner;
J.P. Mathur, Govt. Advocate, for State

Honble ARVIND, M.—These two review petitions have been filed under Section 86 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 against the judgment dated 15.12.2005 passed by this Bench in Reference/LR/691/97/ Alwar and Reference/LR/692/97/Alwar.

2. Both the references were decided by one order and since the subject matter of the review is same with both the petitions; hence both the review petitions are being decided by one order. Copies of this order may be placed in each file.

3. By the review petitions a special emphasise has been made on the fact that the decision of the Cabinet dated 14.9.49 has not been properly interpreted and it has been argued that the land connected with Prem Kunj is part of Prem Kunj and it cannot be treated as a separate government land. Learned counsel for the petitioners also argued that the connected land was accepted as a private property. He also argued that the references were presented after a long lapse of six years and as such this is an error apparent on the face of the record and these cases need to be reviewed because the order passed by this Bench is erroneous and there is error apparent on the face of the record and position of facts and law has not














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top