R.N.ARVIND
Richhpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Karnel Singh – Respondent
2. Briefly, the facts of this review are that the petitioner submitted a suit under Sections 88, 91 and 188 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act before learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Srikaranpur, which is still pending. In this suit an application for injunction was made before learned Sub-Divisional Officer by Richhpal Singh praying that the non-petitioners be prevented from interfering in possession of the petitioner and also should be restrained from transferring the disputed land to anybody. An another application was also made by the non-petitioners for getting injunction against the petitioner for the same purpose. Learned Sub-Divisional Officer consolidated both the applications and legitimately came to the conclusion that there is likelihood of a quarrel between the parties and there is allegation of threatened alienation and he found that it would be proper for the maintenance of peace and protection of the interest of the parties that receiver be appointed. An appeal against this order wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.