GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Surendra Kumar Vyas – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
(2). The facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed on 27/9/1977 (Annex.1) as weaving helper in the Rajasthan Small Scale Industries Corporation - respondent no.2 on consolidated wages @ 150/- pm. Later on, the said wages were increased from 150/- to 350/- in the year 1980, from 350/- to 500/- on 29/3/1982 then from 500/- to 750/-and at last from 27/4/1991 Rs.1200/- was allowed as consolidated wages to the petitioner.
(3). When the services of the petitioner were not regularised though similarly situated persons were granted benefit of regularisation and pay scale, the petitioner directly preferred SLP before Honble Supreme Court and raised the plea that he has completed more than 18 years of service and similarly situated persons, who were appointed along with petitioner on different posts have been regularised and they were granted regular pay scale but same benefit has not been granted to the him. In the said SLP, the Honble Apex Court while grant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.