Honble LODHA, J.–The State Government and its functionaries have taken exception to the other dated 1st December, 2005 passed by the Single Judge whereby he allowed the writ petition and directed the present appellants (respondents therein) to reimburse all the medical bills submitted by the petitioner (present respondent).

(2). The controversy arises from the facts which may be briefly noticed by us immediately hereinafter.

(3). The present respondent (writ petitioner) was at the relevant time working as T.A. to Technical Member, R.W.S.S.M.B. and Superintending Engineer, PHED, Jaipur. On 11th December, 2001, on his way to the office, he suffered pain in the chest and approached his nephew (Dr. Sushil Kalra) working as a Cardiologist in the Tongiya Heart and General Hospital, Jaipur. The petitioner was immediately taken to Intensive Care Unit (`ICU) for ECG, where variance were found and he was advised complete rest and admitted in the hospital for treatment. He was kept in ICU ward under the observation of the doctors for two days i.e. on 11th and 12th December, 2001 and then on 13th December, an angiography was done which showed blockage to the extent of 99%. An angioplasty was adv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document