MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Surendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). Factual matrix of the case is that a first information report for offence under Section 365, 394, 302 and 201 IPC was lodged against the petitioner with Police Station, Khetri. Petitioner applied for grant of bail pending trial under Section 439 Cr.P.C. which was rejected by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khetri. Petitioner thereupon moved the Court of Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2, Jhunjhunu Headquarter Khetri on the premises that his date of birth being 26.6.1989, on the date of incident, which is 26.4.2007, his age was 17 years and 10 months. This was contested by the prosecution which made an application for enquiry into the question of age of the petitioner. The Court by its order dated 13.6.2007 directed for Constitution of Medical Board for determination of the age of the peti
Shiv Shakti Cooperative Housing Society
Pratap Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2005) 3 SCC 551) = (RLW 2005(2) SC 261) 20
Umesh Chandra vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1982 SC 1057) 5
Birad Mal Singhvi vs. Anand Purohit (AIR 1988 SC 1796) 15
Mohd. Idris vs. State of Rajasthan (2007(2) RCC 580) = 2007(2)RLW 913) 5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.