SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 127

VINEET KOTHARI
Khatiza Tul Qubra alias Tara Bano – Appellant
Versus
Iqbal Mohd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
M.A. Siddiqui, for Appellant;
Mukesh Patodia, for Respondent

Honble Dr. KOTHARI, J.—With the consent of counsels, this second appeal is finally disposed of at admission stage. Following substantial questions of law as suggested in the memo of appeal are framed for consideration by this Court:

i) When the option of puberty is opted by a lady by her conduct and same is admitted by the opposite party, in that situation, whether it is necessary to obtain a decree for dissolution of marriage from a competent court?

ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the suit for restitution of conjugal rights is maintainable?

iii) When the plaintiff himself admits that present appellant has entered into second marriage, then the decree for restitution of conjugal rights is justified or not?

iv) Whether the decree of restitution of conjugal rights can be executed when both the parties have remarried?

2. The plaintiff – husband Iqbal Mohd. filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights in the trial Court with the averment that his marriage took place with the appellant wife Smt. Khatiza Tul Qubra D/O Mohd. Aslam Chhipa on 14.4.1984 according to Muslim Sheriyat Law at Bhilwara and she was minor at the time of marriage and was contracted into
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top