SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 59

A.M.KAPADIA, SANGEET LODHA
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Chandu Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Rajendra Charan, for Appellant;
G.J. Gupta, for Respondents.

Hon ble LODHA, J.—These three appeals arise out of the similar orders dated 6.8.08 passed by the learned Single Judge in writ petitions Nos. 3944/08, 3945/08 and 3946/08. By the orders under appeal, the aforesaid writ petitions preferred by the writ petitioner, respondent No.1 herein assailing the validity of orders dated 24.5.98 passed in Rent Petition No. 63/07 and 58/07 and order dated 28.5.98 passed in Rent Petition No. 59/07 by the Rent tribunal, Sri Ganganagar (in short "the tribunal" hereinafter) have been allowed and the aforesaid orders impugned in the writ petitions passed by the learned tribunal taking the reply to the petitions filed on behalf of the appellant-tenant on record have been set aside.

(2). Since the questions involved in all these three appeals arising from the aforesaid orders passed by the learned Single Judge are identical, therefore, the same were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. For the convenience, the facts of D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 1132/98 arising from writ petition No. 3946/08 are being taken into consideration as a lead case.

(3). The relevant facts in nutshell are that the respondent-landlord, preferred a petition











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top