A.M.KAPADIA, SANGEET LODHA
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Chandu Lal – Respondent
(2). Since the questions involved in all these three appeals arising from the aforesaid orders passed by the learned Single Judge are identical, therefore, the same were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. For the convenience, the facts of D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 1132/98 arising from writ petition No. 3946/08 are being taken into consideration as a lead case.
(3). The relevant facts in nutshell are that the respondent-landlord, preferred a petition
Sangram Singh vs. Election tribunal
Kailash vs. Nanhku & Ors. ((2005) 4 SCC 480 = RLW 2005(3) SC 341) 7
Salem Advocate Bar Association
R.N. Jadi & Brothers vs. Subhash Chandra (2007) 6 SCC 420) 7
Sadhna Lodh vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (2003) 3 SCC
M/s. Ajanta Enterprises vs. Bimla Charan Chatterjee and Anr. (1987(1) RLR 991) 25
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.