RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE
Girish Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that in the month of March 2003 there were certain complaints against the non-qualified medical practitioners in District of Kota, alleging that some of them are not having the requisite degrees and there are others who are having fictitious certificates. Some others are having licenses which had not been renewed. In this regard, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Rural) had also made complaint to the petitioner, vide letter dated 11/03/2003. The petitioner was reported that the Registered Medical Practitioners had not been getting their license renewed since long and there had been complaint against them as well as certain nursing homes for committing irregularities in their work. The public had also raised grievance in respect of the subject of the aforesaid complaints. The petitioner had also issued a
Lajpat Rai Gogna vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (1992(1) RLR 619) 9
Prem Prakash Mathur vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (2005(9) RDD 3962 (Raj.)) 9
Ashok Gaur vs. State of Rajasthan (1987(5) SLR 547) 14
Nand Lal Verma vs. State of Rajasthan (1989(1) RLR 601) 15
P.L. Shah vs. Union of India & Ors. ((1989) 1 SCC 546) 16
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.