PREM SHANKAR ASOPA
EIH Associated Hotels Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. In order to deal with the facts in effective manner, the facts referred in the writ petition and the documents annexed thereto; reply and documents annexed thereto as well as rejoinder have been consolidated and the same are as under:
3. In the Master Development Plan of Jaipur, 2011 (in short `the Master Plan) three Zones have been delineated namely `urbanisable area, `ecological zone and `rural area. The case of the petitioner is that land of the afo
Syed Hasan Rasul Numa & Ors. vs. UOI (AIR 1991 SC 711) 16
Shri Sachidanand Pandey & Anr. vs. State of W.B. & Ors. (AIR 1987 SC 1109) 16
Sri K. Ramdas Shenoy vs. The Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council
Bangalore Medical Trust vs. B.S. Muddappa & Ors. ((1991) 4 SCC 54) 10
M.L.Sud & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. ((1992) Supp.(2) SCC 123) 10
Virender Gaur & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. ((1995) 2 SCC 577) 10
Dr. G.N. Khajuria & Ors. vs. Delhi Development Authority & Ors. ((1995) 5 SCC 762) 10
Govt. of A.P. & Ors. vs. J. Sridevi & Ors. ((2002) 5 SCC 37) 10
B.K. Muniraju vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. ((2008) 4 SCC 451) 16
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.