SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 1191

A.M.KAPADIA, D.N.THANVI
Sikander Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Javed Moyal, for Appellants; J.P.S.
Choudhary, Public Prosecutor, for State.

Judgment

A.M. KAPADIA. J.:-

Challenge in this appeal, filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code, for short), is to the correctness of the judgment and order dated 19-3-2004 rendered in Sessions Case No. O5/2001 (1/2000) by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Sirohi. .

2. By the impugned judgment and order, appellant No. 1 Sikander Khan (A-l for short), has been convicted for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 324 and 352 of IPC and has been sentenced to imprisonment of life and fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default to one year imprisonment under Section 302, IPC: seyen years R.I. and fine of Rs. 5,000/-in.default of payment of fine one year imprisonment: Under Section 307, IPC, one year R.I. and fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default of payment of fine one year imprisonment under Section 324, IPC and one month R.I. under Section 352, IPC, whereas Appellant No.2 Zahlr Abbas (for shortA-2) has been convicted for commission of the offence punishable under Section 302/34, 307/34, 324/34 and 352/34 of IPC and sentenced to imprisonment of life and fine of Rs. 5,000/in default one year imprisonment under Section 302/34, IPC, seven years R.I. and fine of Rs. 5,00












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top