C.K.THAKKER, D.K.JAIN
Suman Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Kapur – Respondent
Hon'ble THAKKER, J.— Leave granted.
2. The present appeal is filed by the appellant-wife being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the decree of divorce dated August 07, 2004 passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi in HMA No. 322/2001/96 and confirmed by the High Court of Delhi on January 29, 2007 in Matrimonial Appeal No. 62 of 2004.
3. The facts in nutshell are that the appellant Suman Kapur is the wife and respondent Sudhir Kapur is the husband. The matrimonial alliance was entered into between the parties as per Hindu rites and rituals in Delhi on March 04, 1984. It was the case of the appellant that both the parties were friends from childhood and were knowing each other since 1966. They had also studied together in the same school. They were very close since 1974 and after a friendship of more than a decade, they decided to marry. The marriage was inter-caste marriage. Though initially parents of both the parties were opposed to the marriage, subsequently, they consented. The parties have no issue from the said wedlock.
4. The appellant has a brilliant academic record and has been the recipient of the prestigious Lalor Foundation Fellowship of United States of America
N.G. Dastane vs. S. Dastane ((1975) 2 SCC 326) 25
Sirajmohmedkhan Janmohamadkhan vs. Haizunnisa Yasinkhan & Anr. ((1981) 4 SCC 250) 26
Shobha Rani vs. Madhukar Reddi ((1988) 1 SCC 105) 27
V. Bhagat vs. D. Bhagat (Mrs.) ((1994) 1 SCC 337) 28
Chetan Dass vs. Kamla Devi ((2001) 4 SCC 250) 29
Parveen Mehta vs. Inderjit Mehta ((2002) 5 SCC 706) 30
A. Jayachandra vs. Aneel Kaur ((2005) 2 SCC 22) 31
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.