SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 680

DEEPAK VERMA, PRAKASH TATIA
Zorawal Mal – Appellant
Versus
LRs. of Sri Kishan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Zorawar Mal, Appellant in Person;
D.R. Bhandari and R.K. Purohit, for Respondents

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble TATIA, J.—This D.B. Civil Special Appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 is directed against the judgment and decree dated 21.2.1991 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil First Appeal No.26/1977, whereby the learned Single Judge reversed the judgment and decree dated 28.2.1977 passed by the court of Addl. District Judge No.2, Jodhpur and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff filed in exercise of his right for pre-emption.

2. As per the facts pleaded in the plaint and in further and better particulars submitted in the trial court on the direction issued by the trial court vide order dated 8.2.1974, the original ancestor of the plaintiff was Roop Raj Bora. His son was Fateh Ram Bora. Fateh Ram Bora had three sons-Har Narayan, Narsingh Das and Ram Narayan. Thereafter, it has been stated in further and better particulars that Har Narayan and Narsingh Das got the house from Fateh Ram. How it came to two sons of Fateh Ram and what happened to Ram Narayan son of Fateh Ram, has not been disclosed in the plaint or in further and better particulars. Be it as it may be, it has been stated that after the death of Har Narayan and Narsingh Das









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top