SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 579

R.S.CHAUHAN
Shimnit Utsch India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
S.M.Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mrs. Naina Saraf, for Petitioner;
Paras Kuhad, for Applicant

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—This case has come up on an application for impleadment filed by Promuk Hoffman International Ltd. ('the applicant', for short).

2. According to the applicant, it was one of the participants/ bidders in the tender floated by the State of Rajasthan for affixing of High Security Registration Plates on all types of vehicles in the State. Since the said tender was not granted to the applicant, but was granted to the petitioner, Shimnit Utsch India Ltd., the applicant had filed a writ petition, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3134/2006 before this Court. In the said writ petition, the applicant had challenged the illegal grant of contract to the petitioner. However, vide judgment dated 12-8-2008, a Single Bench of this Court had dismissed the said writ petition. Thereafter, the applicant has filed a Special Appeal, D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.1387/2008, which is presently pending before a learned Division Bench of this Court.

3. On the other hand, in the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 6-3-2009, whereby the office of Transport Commissioner, has suspended the agreement to supply and provide services for affixing high security r















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top