P.R.BORKAR
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sushila – Respondent
2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated as below:.
Present respondent Nos. 1 to 5 are original claimants and they filed the claim petition for compensation in respect of death of Niwarti Bande, who was husband of respondent No.1 and father of respondent Nos. 2 to 5. It is case of respondent Nos. 1 to 5 that Niwarti Bande was a a labourer of about 36 years of age. He was earning Rs. 1000/per month. On 12.04.1992 at about noon deceased Niwarti Bande, P.W.2 – Dattatray Bande, one Bandu and Madhav had gone to to village Tiruka, Tal. Udgir for loading manure of one Govind Tidke. The work was taken by said four persons for Rs.75/per trip. The manure was being transported in the tractor trolley owned by respondent No.7 who was original opponent No.2. The tractor trolly was being driven by respondent No.6. The tractor was bearing No. MYI3751 and the trolly was bearing No. MYI3752. The tractor and the trolly were insured
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Swaran Singh & Ors. ((2004) 3 SCC 297 = RLW 2004(2) SC 161) 17
Minu B. Mehta & Anr. vs. Balkrishna Ramchandra Nayan & Anr. (AIR 1977 SC 1248) 18
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Prabhu Lal ((2008) 1 SCC 696 = 2008(1) RLW (SC) 697) 20
Ramashray Singh vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. (AIR 2003 SC 2877 = RLW 2003(4) SC 537) 25
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sarjerao & Ors. (AIR 2008 SC 460) 25
Rajndra Raghunath Girme vs. Pramila Dattu Surse (Kumari) & Ors. (2002(3) Bom.C.R. 305) 28
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.