SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 104

J.R.MIDHA
Chiranji Lal – Appellant
Versus
Mangat Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Y.R. Sharma, for Appellants;
S.L. Gupta, for Respondents

Hon'ble MIDHA, J.—The appellants have challenged the award of the learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.60,000/- has been awarded to them. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.

2. The accident dated 19th January, 1991 resulted in the death of Kumari Santosh. The deceased was survived by her parents who filed claim petition before the learned Tribunal.

3. The deceased was aged 9 years at the time of the accident and was a student of third class in Prathamik Bal Vidyalaya, R.K. Puram, New Delhi.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant refers and relies upon the judgment of this Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Farzana, MAC APP. No.13/2007 decided on 14th July, 2009 in which compensation of Rs.3,75,000/- has been determined in respect of the death of a child aged 7 years, following the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Court in the cases of Manju Devi vs. Musafir Paswan, VII (2005) SLT 257, Sobhagya Devi vs. Sukhvir Singh, II (2006) ACC 1997, Syam Narayan vs. Kitty Tours & Travels, 2006 ACJ 320, R.K. Malik vs. Kiran Pal, III (2006) ACC 261, R.K. Malik vs. Kiran Pal, 2009(8) Scale 451. This Court held as under: -

“4. In the case of Ma































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top