[Citation : 2012(1) RLW 680 (Raj.)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
State of Raj. Vs. Manoj Yadav (Mehta, J.)
HON'BLE A.M. SAPRE, J.
HON'BLE SANDEEP MEHTA, J.
State of Rajasthan
Versus
Manoj Yadav
D.B. Criminal Murder Reference No.1 of 2010
and
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 2010, decided on 18.07.2010
Appeal partly allowed.
n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 302] 303] 201 & e`R;q n.M nsuk & os ekin.M ftu ij fopkj fd;k tkuk gksrk gS & e`rd fiNys rhu o"kksZ ls vihykFkhZ ds lkFk jg jgh Fkh &mldk 'ko vihykFkhZ ds dejs ds ftlds ckgj njokts ij rkyk yxk gqvk Fkk] ds Hkhrj IykfLVd ds csfMax jksy esa can fd;k feyk & ifjfLFkfrd lk{; ds vk/kkj ij rFkk vfHk;qDr dh bl vkijkf/kd i`"B Hkwfe dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, fd iwoZ esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; us mls Hkk-n-al-a dh /kkjk 302 ds rgr vijk/k gsrq nks"k fl) dj mls ltk nh & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & gsrq rFkk vR;Ur gh Øwj <ax ls —R; djus dk vHkko gS & Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 303 esa fu/kkZfjr fLFkfr vlaoS/kkfud gksus ds dkj.k loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk mldks vfHk[kf.Mr fd;k tk pqdk gS & izdj.k nqyZHkre esa ls nqyZHk ekeys dh Js.kh esa vkuk pkfg;s & ,d ek= mnkgj.k fd vihykFkhZ dks iwoZ esa Hkh gR;k ds vijk/k dk nks"kh Bgjk;k x;k Fkk] e`R;q n.M nsus dk vk/kkj ugha cu ldrk & e`R;q n.M dks vkthou dkjkokl esa :ikUrfjr fd;k rFkk mls vius 'ks"k thou dky esa Hkh tsy ls fjgk ugha fd;k tk;sxkA ¼in la[;k 15 ls 18] 21] 22½
vihy va'kr% Lohdkj dhA
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Uttam Chand (PW-1) lodged a written report at the Police Station, Kotgate, Bikaner on 21.1.2006 alleging inter alia that he received a call from the Manager of the Bikaner Guest House, Dhobi Mohalla, Bikaner who informed the first informant that some body call him in the Guest House saying that he was calling from the crime branch. Manoj Sharma has informed that the person named Rajesh Sharma who was living in the Guest House in the month of December and was having two ladies with him, who probably murdered the lady and the dead body was lying in the house of Uttam Dhobi which was taken on rent. The first informant went to the Guest House and called back on the number from which call had been made. It was found that the call had been received from Riva M.P. The matter was thereafter reported to the police and the lock of the room of Kishan Lal Dhobi was broken and on search being made, stink of dead body was coming from the plastic bedding roll lying in the room. The bedding roll was brought to the hospital and on opening the dead body of a lady was found which was having injuries. The lady was being accompanied with another girl and a man who had taken the first floor of the house of Uttam Dhobi on rent on 10.12.2005 for monthly rent of Rs. 1300/-. It was further alleged that the dead body was of one of the two females who was living in the room with her companion who murdered her and left the body in the room. It has been further alleged that the occupant of the room can be identified and that the man had given out his name to be Rajesh Sharma resident of Aakola. On the basis of this report, FIR No. 22/2006 was registered and investigation commenced. After conclusion of the investigation, the charge-sheet was filed against the appellant and the co-accused Jaishri wife of the appellant for the offences under Sections 366, 366/34, 302 and in alternative under Section 302/34, 201 and in alternative under Section 201/34 IPC. The charge-sheet was filed in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner, from where the same was committed to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner, who transferred the same to the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Bikaner. Charges were framed against accused-appellant Manoj Yadav as well as co-accused Jaishri for the aforesaid offences. They pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. At the trial, the prosecution produced as many as 23 witnesses in support of is case. During the course of trial, accused Jaishri expired while in judicial custody on 11.9.2009 and thus proceedings against her were dropped on 25.9.2009. In the statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C., the accused denied the allegations of the prosecution but did not lead any defence. At the conclusion of trial, learned trial Court acquitted the appellant Manoj Yadav from the charge under Section 366, IPC and has proceeded to convict the appellant for the offence under Sections 302 and 201, IPC and has sentenced the appellant to five years' R.I. on count of Section 201 IPC and a fine of Rs. 300/- and in default thereof, to further undergo three months' imprisonment and on the count of Section 302 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to death.
3. Murder Reference No. 1/2010 has been made by the learned trial Judge seeking confirmation of the death sentence, while Jail Appeal No. 26/2010 has been filed by the appellant from the Jail, whereas Appeal No. 97/2010 has been filed as a represented appeal by Shri S.R. Sharma, Advocate.
4. Assailing the judgment of the learned trial Judge, Shri Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted to this Court that in this case, the
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan vs. State of Maharashtra ((2006) 10 SCC 681) 13
Earabhadrappa vs. State of Karnataka (AIR 1983 SC 446) 16
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1980 SC 898) 16
Swamy Shraddananda @ Murli Manohar Mishra vs. State of Karantaka (AIR 2008 SC 3040) 16
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.