[Citation : 2012(3) RLW 2009 (SC)]
(Supreme Court)
Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar Vs. State of Haryana (Dr. Chauhan, J.)
HON'BLE DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, J.
Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar
Versus
State of Haryana
Criminal Appeal No. 523 of 2010, decided on 07.05.2012
Appeal disposed of.
n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 302@376¼2½ ,oa 201 & e`R;q n.M nsuk & pkj o"kZ dh vk;q dh iq=h ds lkFk nq"deZ dj mldh gR;k dh & e`R;q n.M nsus gsrq xq:Rrj ifjfLFkfr;ksa dh fo|ekurk vkSj mRrjksRrj de gksus okyh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk ifj.kkfed vHkko gksuk vko';d gS & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & ekeyk nqyZHkre esa ls nqyZHk ekeyksa dh Js.kh esa ugha vkrk& vijk/k dh izd`fr] ihfM+rk dh vk;q vkSj vihykFkhZ ds lkFk mlds lEcU/k ij fopkj djrs gq, e`R;q n.M vikLr dj vkthou dkjkokl dh ltk nh & vihykFkhZ dks fcuk fdlh NwV ds tsy esa de ls de rhl o"kZ dh ltk Hkqxruh vko';d gSA ¼in la[;k 24 o 27½
vihy fuLrkfjr dhA
2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that :
A. Smt. Roopa Devi (PW.3) wife of Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar – appellant, had gone to her parental home at village Kesri alongwith her minor son on 26.6.2007 leaving her two children i.e. Sanjana, daughter, 4 years old and Vishal, son, 2 years old at her matrimonial home with her husband – appellant. She had to return back on the same day but could not return and stayed at her parental home. On the same day, she received information by telephone at 4.00 p.m. from her brother-in-law Ramesh Kumar that her husband had committed rape upon her 4 years old daughter Sanjana. Roopa Devi (PW.3) came back to her matrimonial home on the next day i.e. 27.6.2007 alongwith 5-7 persons including her family members and neighbours and found her daughter Sanjana, victim, in an injured condition. The Panchayat was convened to resolve the problems. However, the Panchayat could not resolve the dispute, therefore, Roopa Devi (PW.3), complainant, returned to her parental home alongwith accompanying persons leaving her injured daughter Sanjana and son Vishal in the custody of the appellant at her matrimonial home. Roopa Devi (PW.3) wanted to take her injured daughter for medical help, but the appellant and his family members restricted her and even tried to snatch her 15 days old son from her.
B. Roopa Devi (PW.3) received a telephone call again from her brother-in-law Ramesh Kumar on 28.6.2007 informing her that appellant had killed her daughter Sanjana. She came there alongwith her brother Gulla (PW.4) and lodged the report to P.S. Bilaspur against the appellant for committing the rape on her 4 years old daughter Sanjana on 26.6.2007 and against her brother-in-laws and appellant for committing her murder on 27/28.6.2007 and concealing her dead body. Thus, on her complaint, a case under Sections 376(2)(f), 302, 201/34 IPC vide FIR No. 91 dated 28.6.2007 at Police Station Bilaspur (Haryana) was registered.
C. Immediately, thereafter, on the same day i.e. 28.6.2007, on the application moved by the Investigation Officer, the Deputy Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar, authorised Shri Narender Singh, SDM, Jagadhari to pass an order of exhumation of the dead body from the graveyard and on such order being passed, the dead body was recovered from the graveyard. It was photographed and an inquest report was prepared. Dead body was sent for post-mortem examination. The requisite plan of place of recovery of dead body was prepared. The Investigating Officer inspected the place of occurrence on 29.6.2007 and prepared the site plan. The appellant and his brothers were arrested on 30.6.2007. Appellant was medically examined and on his disclosure statement, the Investigating Officer recovered one blood stained bed sheet from his house and further a gunny bag containing one Pajama, blood stained piece of cloth, pant, shirt and one pillow from a rainy culvert near Majaar of Peer on Kapal Mochan Road (Exts. P-23 and P-25).
D. After filing the chargesheet, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions and on conclusion of the trial, the learned Sessions Judge vide judgment and order dated 2.3.2009 acquitted all other co-accused but convicted the appellant under Sections 302, 376(2)(f) and 201 IPC and vide order dated 6.3.2009 awarded death sentence under Section 302 IPC, life imprisonment under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 3 years for the offence under Sec
Prithipal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. ((2012) 1 SCC 10) 17
State of West Bengal vs. Mir Mohammad Omar & Ors. etc.etc. (AIR 2000 SC 2988) 17
Sahadevan @ Sagadevan vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
Santosh Kumar Singh vs. State through CBI ((2010) 9 SCC 747) 17
Manu Sao vs. State of Bihar ((2010) 12 SCC 310) 17
Pradeep Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 2004 SC 3781) 19
Aftab Ahmad Anasari vs. State of Uttaranchal (AIR 2010 SC 773) 19
State of Maharashtra vs. Goraksha Ambaji Adsul (AIR 2011 SC 2689) 22
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1980 SC 898) 22
Machchi Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1983 SC 957) 22
Devender Pal Singh vs. State NCT of Delhi & Anr. (AIR 2002 SC 1661) 22
Haresh Mohandas Rajput vs. State of Maharashtra ((2011) 12 SCC 56) 23
Swami Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra vs. State of Karnataka (AIR 2008 SC 3040) 25
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.