B.S.CHAUHAN, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that :
A. Smt. Roopa Devi (PW.3) wife of Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar – appellant, had gone to her parental home at village Kesri alongwith her minor son on 26.6.2007 leaving her two children i.e. Sanjana, daughter, 4 years old and Vishal, son, 2 years old at her matrimonial home with her husband – appellant. She had to return back on the same day but could not return and stayed at her parental home. On the same day, she received information by telephone at 4.00 p.m. from her brother-in-law Ramesh Kumar that her husband had committed rape upon her 4 years old daughter Sanjana. Roopa Devi (PW.3
Prithipal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. ((2012) 1 SCC 10) 17
State of West Bengal vs. Mir Mohammad Omar & Ors. etc.etc. (AIR 2000 SC 2988) 17
Sahadevan @ Sagadevan vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
Santosh Kumar Singh vs. State through CBI ((2010) 9 SCC 747) 17
Manu Sao vs. State of Bihar ((2010) 12 SCC 310) 17
Pradeep Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 2004 SC 3781) 19
Aftab Ahmad Anasari vs. State of Uttaranchal (AIR 2010 SC 773) 19
State of Maharashtra vs. Goraksha Ambaji Adsul (AIR 2011 SC 2689) 22
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1980 SC 898) 22
Machchi Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1983 SC 957) 22
Devender Pal Singh vs. State NCT of Delhi & Anr. (AIR 2002 SC 1661) 22
Haresh Mohandas Rajput vs. State of Maharashtra ((2011) 12 SCC 56) 23
Swami Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra vs. State of Karnataka (AIR 2008 SC 3040) 25
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.