M.N.BHANDARI
Laxman Prasad Meena – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal – Respondent
2. The appeal was preferred to challenge recommendation of D.P.C. meeting held on 9.2.2004. It was with a further prayer that provisional list dated 24.4.1999 should be first finalized and consideration of the candidature for promotion may be made thereupon.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that 89 posts of Assistant Engineer were up-graded to the posts of Executive Engineer vide the order dated 13.12.2002. On creation of those posts, the private respondent No. 3 filed a writ petition bearing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 176/2003. This was to challenge benefit of reservation to the candidates for promotion to the afore-said vacancies for the year of 2002-03
Union of India & Ors. vs. N.Y. Apte & Ors. ((1998) 6 SCC 741) 6
Girjesh Shrivastava & Ors. vs. State of M.P. & Ors. ((2010) 10 SCC 707) 6
Tridip Kumar Dingal & Ors. vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. ((2009) 1 SCC 168) 11
State of Uttaranchal vs. Madan Mohan Joshi & Ors. ((2008) 6 SCC 797) 11
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.