SHRIMAL, MEMBER – This is a review petition under Section 229 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (in short to be called ``the Act) against the order of this Court dated 29.10.2002 passed on stay application in appeal No. 187/2002. The applicant in this review petition is the respondent in the appeal.

(2). In the present case the point for consideration is, as to whether the review petitions deserve admission or not?

(3). Two revenue suits was filed before Asstt. Collector, Suratgarh, one by Vijendra Kumar and Ramesh sons of Dashrath and other by Vinod Kumar son of Prithvi. The trial Court by its judgment dated 15.12.2000 decided issue No. 10 with regard to the competence of revenue Court to grant relief in the suit. This issue was decided against plaintff. Against this judgment, the plaintiff filed an appeal before Revenue Appellate Authority, Hanumangarh, who by his judgment and decree dated 17.8.2002 allowed the appeal and decreed the suit. Against the judgment of Revenue Appellate Authority, Hanumangarh, second appeal was filed by the defendants. After hearing on the admission of the second appeal, two Honble Members of the Board of Revenue had difference of opinion with regard to the admission of the appeals, therefore, this was referred to third member. The Honble third member of the Board by his order dated 1.10.2002 admitted the appeal and issue notice. Subsequently, after service of notice on 29.10.2002, the two members of the Board heard the stay application in the appeal and by the order dated 29.10.2002 allowed the stay application. Against this order of this Court, present review petition along with seven other review petitions of similar nature have been filed.

(4). Since in all the petitions the parties are same and the legal question to be decided is also same. Therefore, the arguments were heard in all the review petitions and are being decided by a common judgment, copy of which may be placed in each file.

(5). Before dealing with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicants, it is worthwhile to reproduce the order on stay application dated 29.10.2002:-

^^vfHkHkk"kd vihykUV Jh ,y-ds- ik.M;k o vfHkHkk"kd jsLiks.MsUVl Hkh ts-ih- ekFkqj mifLFkr gS] ftUgsa izkFkZuk i= LFkxu ij lquk x;kA

vfHkHkk"kd vihykUV Jh ,y-ds- ik.M;k dk rdZ gS fd pwafd izdj.k vf/k"BkbZ izd`fr dk gSA tc izdj.k izFke n`"V;k xzg.k ;ksX; ik;k x;k gSA rHkh izdj.k dks fopkjkFkZ xzg.k fd;k x;k gSA ;fn ekSds o jsdkMZ dh ;FkkfLFkkfr ugha j[kh xbZ rks mUgsa viw.kZuh; {kfr gksxh rFkk mudk vihy izLrqr dj U;k; izkIr djus dk gh mn~ns; lekIr gks tk;sxkA blds vykok mUgsa vuko;d eqdnesackth esa my>uk iM+sxkA

jsLiks.MsUV ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk rdZ gS fd flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk dk vknsk 41 fu;e 5 ds ijUrqd 3 esa vkKkid izko/kku gS fd ;fn i;kZIr dkj.k ugha gks rks LFkxu vknsk ikfjr ugha fd;k tkosA vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ Bksl vk/kkj LFkxu vknsk izkIr djus ckcr izLrqr ugha fd;s x;s gSA nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ds ,d nwljs ds foijhr gS vkSj vihy vf/kdkjh ds }kjk viuk fu.kZ; iw.kZ foys"k.k ds vk/kkj ij gh fn;k x;k gSA vr% LFkxu izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

izR;qRrj esa odhy vihykFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd 23 o"kZ iwoZ Ø; dh xbZ vkjkth ds ckcr ;fn LFkxu ugha fn;k x;k rks dkfct O;fDr csn[ky gks tk;saxsA tc izdj.k dks fopkjkFkZ xzg.k dj fy;k x;k gS rks izFke n`"V;k ;g vnkyr }kjk eku fy;k x;k gS fd izdj.k esa fookn ,oa nknjlh ckcr Bksl eqn~ns fufgr gSA ,sls esa ;fn ;FkkfLFkfr ugha j[kh tkrh gS rks bu eqn~nksa ij fu.kZ; gksus ls iwoZ gh nhxj i{k }kjk vihyk.V ds fgr ds izfrdwy rcnhfy;ka dh tk ldrh gSA ftlls fd izdj.k dks izHkkoghu ,oa vFkZghu gks tk;sxkA vr% okafNr LFkxu vknsk ikfjr djuk U;k; fgr es ,d vfuok;Z vko;drk gSA

geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa dk voyksdu fd;kA

izLrqr vihy esa e.My }kjk lkjHkwr dkuwuh fcUnq fufgr gksus ls vihy dks fopkjkFkZ xzg.k fd;k tk pqdk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ekeys ds rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k; fgr esa mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ;fn jktLo vihy izkf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document