SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 654

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL, B.L.MEENA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Sardara – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Jagdish Prasad Mathur, Govt. Advocate, for Appellant;
Jagdamba Prasad Mathur, for Respondents

Jheky] lnL;&;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e kCn ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tk;sxk½ fo:) Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] vyoj ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 27-10-99 ¼vihy la[;k 27@99½ izLrqr dh x;h gSA

2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd izR;FkhZx.k@oknhx.k us ,d jktLo okn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88 ds vUrxZr bUnzkt nq:Lrh ds laca/k esa U;k;ky; mi [k.M vf/kdkjh] cgjksM+ ds le{k vihykFkhZ@izfroknh ds fo:) bl vkk; dk izLrqr fd;k fd vkjkth lkfcd [kljk uEcj 962 jdck 30 ch?kk okds xzke mUVksyh rglhy cgjksM+ esa fLFkr gS ¼ftls rRipkr~ fooknxzLr Hkwfe ls lacksf/kr fd;k tkosxk½ fooknxzLr Hkwfe ds gky cUnkscLr esa [kljk uEcj 1064 jdck 4 gSDVs;j 50 ,;j rFkk [kljk uEcj 1142 jdck 90 ,;j] [kljk uEcj 1143 jdck 24 ,;j cus gSA fooknxzLr Hkwfe iwoZ esa uku flag dh [kkrsnkjh o dCts dkr dh vkjkth Fkh] tks xyrh ls tekcUnh esa xSj [kkrsnkj ntZ dj nh xbZ] ftls nq:Lr dj izR;FkhZx.k dks fooknxzLr Hkwfe dk [kkrsnkj ntZ fd;k tk;sA mDr vkjkth ukuflag us izR;FkhZx.k ds firk dks tfj;s iathd`r foØ; i= fnukad 10-5-68 dks foØ; dj fooknxzLr Hkwfe dk dCtk laHkyk;kA rHkh ls izR;FkhZx.k cgSfl;r [kkrsnkj dkrdkj fooknxzLr Hkwfe ij dkfct gksdj dkr djrs py






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top