NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN, MEENA V.GOMBER
Attar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Hon'ble Dr. GOMBER, J.—These are two criminal appeals and one Criminal revision petition and they arise out of three different judgments of the Trial Court dated 7.10.2003 in Sessions Case No. 04/2003; dated 13.9.2005 in Sessions Case No. 60/2005 (153/2003); and dated 30.8.2007 in sessions case No. 86/2005.
2. The challenge in all these three matters pertains to the incident of the same date that took place on 31.5.2002 at about 2.00 pm in the jurisdiction of Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur with regard to which an FIR No. 274/2002 was registered on the statement (Parcha Bayan) of Smt. Badni PW.3 at P.S. Nadbai on the same day i.e. 31.5.2002. Total 10-11 persons were involved in the crime, out of whom 7 were named accused persons in the crime and remaining were mentioned as "etc."
3. Initially only one accused person who was not mentioned by name in that FIR namely accused Attar Singh could be apprehended and was sent for trial. He was convicted for offences under Sections 148, 364, 302/149 and 325/149 IPC by the Trial Court vide its judgment dated 7.10.2003 in sessions case No. 04/2003. The First criminal appeal No. 1528/2003 is by accused Attar Singh aggrieved by h
Maliat Singh vs. State of Punjab ((1991) 4 SCC 391) 34
Baladin vs. State of U.P. (AIR 1956 SC 181) 55
Bishambhar Bhagat vs. State of Bihar (AIR 1971 SC 2381) 55
Nallamsetty Yanadaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (AIR 1993 SC 1175) 56
Bharwad Mepa Dana vs. State of Bombay ((1960) 2 SCR 172) 60
Abdul Sayeed vs. State of M.P. ((2010) 10 SCC 259) 60
Virendra Singh vs. State of MP ((2010) 8 SCC 407) 62
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.