SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 34

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Mathur, J
SANTOSH SHANKAR RAO - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent
CRLMB / 2079 / 2025
Decided On : 03-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Suresh Nehra, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

Bail can be granted when the accused has been in custody for an extended period, and the trial is triable by Magistrate, without commenting on the case's merits.

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - The petitioner, accused in a case involving conspiracy and fraud, claims false implication with no funds being transferred to him, as amounts were deposited in co-accused's accounts - The offences are triable by Magistrate, and the petitioner has been in custody for a considerable duration. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Bail - Considerations for granting bail include the nature of the offence, duration of custody, and the fact that the trial may take time. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused in FIR No. 80/2023 under Sections 406, 420, and 120-B IPC, alleging conspiracy and fraud involving multiple co-accused. The petitioner asserts he was appointed by co-accused for fixed payment and did not receive any of the alleged extorted funds.

Findings of Court:
The court found it just to grant bail due to the trial being triable by Magistrate and the lengthy custody period of the petitioner.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the allegations and the nature of the charges.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that the nature of the accusations and the fact that the petitioner had been in custody for an extended period warranted the granting of bail without commenting on the case's merits.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 80/2023 registered at Police Station Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh for the offence under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The main allegation of conspiracy and creating forge company and extorting money from various persons by duping them are against other co-accused Upendra Singh Rudradev, Gyan Prakash, Lallan Kumar, Ranjan Kumar, Kajal Jha, Rajni Singh and Sokhilal. Learned counsel further submits that no amount was transferred into the bank account of petitioner. The entire amount obtained from various complainant was deposited in the account maintained by co- accused Upendra Singh Rudradev and in their company’s account. It is also submitted that petitioner was appointed by co-accused Upendra Singh Rudradev on fixed payment. The accused- petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate, therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the grant of bail application.

4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. The allegation of procuring the money from various complainant by assuring them to appoint in the company is against co-accused namely Upendra Singh Rudradev and other co-accused. The entire amount obtained from the various complainant were also deposited in the account maintained by other co-accused, the other FIR instituted against the petitioner are also related to the same act.

5. Considering the above facts and taking into the consideration that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, without expressing anything on the merit of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Santosh Shankar Rao S/o Shri Shankar Rav Patil, in connection with FIR No. 80/2023 registered at Police Station Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top