SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 643

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
KISHAN LAL @ KRISHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Jitendra Ojha, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

ORDER :

(KULDEEP MATHUR, J.)

This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.54/2024 registered at Police Station Hindumalkot, Dist. Sri Ganganagar, for the offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 315 of IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the FIR, challan papers and the statements of the prosecutrix ‘J’ recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prosecutrix ‘J’ in her statements has levelled specific allegation of she being subjected to sexual assault/rape by Gurmeet Singh, Gattu, Dr. Bhanwar Lal, Baba Kesar Singh and Kishanlal i.e. the present petitioner. However, police after making investigation has filed challan only against the present petitioner on the ground that the prosecutrix became pregnant due to the alleged sexual assault/rape committed upon her by the present petitioner.

4. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The material available on record indic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top