HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Pushpendra Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
(FARJAND ALI, J.)
1. The instant criminal misc. Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of FIR No. 404/2024 registered at Police Station Surajpole, District Udaipur for the offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS and 103, 104 of trade mark act, 1999.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an amicable settlement and now, there remains no controversy in between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings further.
3. Learned counsel appearing for complainant-respondent admits the fact of compromise and submits that he is willing if the FIR and the proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise entered in between the parties.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.
5. Heard, perused the material available on record more particularly the police report, nature of allegation and the compromise deed executed in between the parties. The parties to the lis have resolved their dispute amicably and do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings and have jointly prayed for quashing of the same. The offence alleged in this matter is non- c
The High Court can quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences if the dispute is personal and does not affect public peace, using inherent powers to restore harmony.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences if they are personal in nature and do not affect public peace, promoting harmony between parties.
The High Court may quash non-compoundable offences if they arise from personal disputes that do not affect public peace, promoting amicable resolutions.
The court can quash proceedings for non-compoundable offences if the dispute is personal and does not affect public peace, promoting harmony between parties.
Quashing of non-compoundable FIRs is permissible when disputes are personal, do not affect public peace, and are resolved amicably.
The court can exercise its inherent power to quash criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement if the offences are entirely personal in nature and do not affect public peace or tranquility.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences if the dispute is personal and does not affect public peace, promoting harmony between parties.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences if the dispute is personal and does not affect public peace, promoting justice and harmony.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable FIRs when disputes are personal and do not affect public peace, as guided by precedent.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences if parties resolve disputes amicably and it does not affect public peace, exercising inherent powers for justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.