HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J
M/s Laxman Khichi - Appellant
Versus
Au Small Finance Bank Limited - Respondent
CW / 294 / 2025
Decided On : 17-02-2025
(A) SARFAESI Act, 2002 - Section 13(2) - Writ petition filed seeking to prevent possession of property and regularize loan accounts - Petitioners expressed willingness to pay dues, proposing a payment plan - Respondent-Bank accepted the proposal, with conditions for recovery in case of default. (Paras 2-6)
(B) Loan Recovery - Court emphasizes the importance of adherence to commitments made in court regarding payment of dues - Failure to comply allows the Bank to initiate recovery proceedings. (Paras 5-6)
Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought to prevent the Bank from taking possession of property and to regularize their loan accounts, proposing a payment plan to settle their dues.
Findings of Court:
The court accepted the petitioners' payment proposal, directing them to deposit a significant sum by a specified date and outlining further payment installments.
Issues: The key issue was whether to allow the petitioners to regularize their loan accounts while preventing possession of property.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners' commitment to pay their dues must be strictly adhered to, with consequences outlined for non-compliance.
Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for payment.
ORDER :
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J.)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petition as been filed with the following prayers : -
“I. By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondent may be directed to not to take possession of the property in question.
II. By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondent may be directed to regularize the loan accounts of the petitioner firm.
III. By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondent may be directed to withdraw the possession notice dated 26.11.2024 (Annexure-3) and drop the proceedings initiated against the present petitioner under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 which has commenced vide notice under section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act dated 10.09.2024 (Annexure-2) and withdraw the notice dated 27.11.2024(Annexure-4) and 03.12.2024 (Annexure-5).
IV. Pass any other writ order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are ready and willing to pay the entire dues of the respondent-Bank provided certain time is granted to them. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners are ready to deposit Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees : One Crore Only) by 31.03.2025 and for rest of the amount, the petitioners are ready to deposit the amount in four installments on or before 31.12.2025.
4. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners is gracefully accepted by learned counsel for the respondent-Bank. He submits that if the petitioners do not adhere to the commitment made before this Court, the respondents may be granted liberty to take appropriate measures for recovery of the amount due from the petitioners at any stage.
5. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to deposit Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees : One Crore Only) on or before 31.03.2025 and for balance of the amount, which shall be calculated by the respondent-Bank on 01.04.2025, be paid by the petitioners in four installments on or before 31.12.2025.
6. It is also made clear that if the petitioners fail to adhere to the commitment made before this Court hereinabove, the respondents will be free to take appropriate proceedings for recovery of their loan amount at the stage on which the petitioners have committed the default.
7. The stay application and other pending application, if any, also stand disposed of.
The court upheld the necessity of adhering to payment commitments made in court, allowing the Bank to initiate recovery if the petitioners default.
Timely payment of dues under the SARFAESI Act prevents recovery proceedings and mandates return of documents to the debtor.
Parties in financial distress can negotiate repayment terms, impacting the enforcement of recovery actions.
Non-compliance with a court's interim order precludes the granting of relief in a writ petition.
The court grants an installment repayment plan for a loan default under the SARFAESI Act, balancing creditor rights and debtor ability.
The legal proceedings involving loan repayment under the SARFAESI Act and the court's authority for setting payment schedules.
The court allows the petitioner to repay the outstanding loan in installments while deferring any coercive action.
The court affirms the procedure for recovery under the SARFAESI Act, allowing restructuring of the loan repayment with stipulated consequences for default.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.