Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL, J
M/S BALKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER :
(Sudesh Bansal, J.)
1. In all the review petitions, final judgment dated 07.02.2022, sought to be reviewed, is common and the ground of review is also similar, hence with the consent of counsel for review petitioner, all review petitions have been heard together and would stand decided by this common Order.
2. For the sake of convenience, facts of DB Review Petition (Writ) No.73/2022 are being taken into consideration.
3. Instant review petition has been filed by and on behalf of original writ petitioner, invoking provision of Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, praying for review of the final judgment dated 07.02.2022 passed in DB Civil Writ Petition No.2835/2021 and in other connected writ petitions, dismissing all the writ petitions and affirming the rejection of petitioner's claim under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 (for short "Rules of 2002"), for rebate of excise duty paid on the final products.
4. It has been pleaded in the review petition and argued by the counsel for review petitioner that during course of arguments, put forth at the time of arguing the writ petition, contention was raised by and on behalf of petition
A review petition cannot be used to re-argue the merits of a case but is limited to correcting apparent mistakes on the record.
The court affirmed that rebate claims under the Central Excise Act must be filed within one year, with no allowance for extensions based on delays in document receipt.
The judgment established the need for strict compliance with exemption or concession provisions and highlighted the applicability of central excise duty on waste/scraps.
A manufacturer-exporter can claim both input and output benefits without constituting double benefits, as they relate to different tax incidences.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the District Committee to submit a fact-finding report to the State Government for a decision on the petitioner's representa....
Application for rebate of duty shall be governed by Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and shall have to be made before expiry of one year from “relevant date” and in such form and manner as may....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
