SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 846

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
REKHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLW / 375 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Praveen Bhati, Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, PP

The right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution mandates protection from threats, emphasizing the need for adequate security for individuals facing danger.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Right to life, limb and personal liberty - Petitioners sought protection from threats posed by family members and relatives, claiming violation of their fundamental rights - Court focused on the need for protection without delving into the specifics of the relationships involved. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Fundamental Rights - The right to reside with honor and dignity is inherent to citizens, necessitating protection when threatened - The court emphasized the petitioners' right to seek protection under Article 21. (Paras 4-5)

(C) Procedural Directions - The petitioners were directed to approach the Superintendent of Police for addressing their grievances regarding threats and obtaining necessary protection. (Paras 5-6)

Order :

1. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of their family members and other relatives.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life, limb and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same. Being the citizens of independent India, the petitioners have right to reside with honour and dignity. Therefore, they have sought the protection from the hands of private respondents and they also sought direction to respondents to provide them protection.

3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the case, this Court is neither going into the niceties of the matter nor proving the relationship between the petitioners, as it is the subject matter of investigation before the Investigating Officer, and is concerned only about the protection of life, limb and liberty as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India .

4. Since the petitioners apprehend threat to their right of life and liberty, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioners have every right to seek the protection of their life, limb and liberty.

5. In this view of the matter, the instant criminal writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the concerned Superintendent of Police along with appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The concerned Superintendent of Police shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

6. It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top