HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Mr. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, CJ, Mr. Uma Shanker Vyas, J
PARMESHWAR JHA S/O TRAPTINARAYAN JHA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. POONAM – Respondent
Order :
1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by this Court on 06.11.2015.
2. The order passed by this Court was a judgment in rem.
3. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioners. Instead of issuing notice on contempt, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction that the case of the petitioners shall also be examined in terms of an order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in the case of Shri Banwari Lal Bhukar & Anr. vs. Anoop Khinchi & Ors.-D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.740/2016 and other connected matters wherein this Court had given detailed directions as below:-
“1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the directions which have already been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Manju Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.13791/2019, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within a period of eight weeks.
2. A brief, but clear order regarding compl
Court emphasizes compliance with prior orders regarding the release of dues to petitioners, mandating clear reporting and obligations for authorities.
The Court emphasized mandatory compliance with its orders and established timelines for action by authorities, reinforcing judicial authority.
Court emphasized the obligation of authorities to comply with prior orders and directed timely reporting of compliance regarding dues payable to petitioners.
Court emphasized the obligation of compliance with prior orders, establishing a clear directive for the Commissioner, College Education to release dues to petitioners.
The court emphasized the obligation of the Commissioner, College Education, to comply with prior orders regarding the release of dues and report compliance, reinforcing the authority of the court's d....
Court emphasized mandatory compliance with earlier orders and set timelines for reporting back to the court regarding contempt petitions.
Court emphasized the obligation of authorities to comply with court orders and report compliance, ensuring timely resolution of grievances.
The court emphasized mandatory compliance with its orders and the obligation to report back on such compliance in contempt matters.
The court emphasized mandatory compliance with its orders, granting liberty to revive the petition if grievances remain unaddressed.
Court emphasized the obligation to comply with previous orders and established a framework for compliance reporting, allowing revival of the petition if grievances remain.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.