SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1050

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
ABDUL RAFIQUE AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Harshvardhan Singh, Mr. Shrawan Singh Rathore, PP

Order :

1. By way of filing the present revision petition, the petitioners-accused have challenged the judgment dated 24.08.2007 passed by the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara in criminal appeal no. 94/2007 whereby the judgment and order of conviction dated 30.04.2007 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate- I No. 3, Bhilwara has been affirmed and the petitioners accused have been convicted for the offence under sections 3/25 of the Arms Act.

2. As per prosecution, the allegation against the present petitioners is that on 26.08.1991, the petitioners- accused and the co-accused Hafiz Mohammed were found in possession of articles used for the preparation/ construction of arms without any license to produce the same.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the incident in the present case occurred in the year 1991. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners possessed a license which was issued in the name of Rasool Khan and one Ajij Ahmed. Learned counsel submitted that though on the date of occurrence, Rasool Khan had died, yet Ajij Ahmed was very much alive and there is nothing on record to establish that the present petitioners were preparing the weapons of their o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top