SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1082

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA, J
SHRI BHAWANI SHANKAR TIWARI S/O LATE SHRI DEVI PRASAD TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
BALRAM JHAKHAD S/O SHRI KESHARAM – Respondent
CW / 1919 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat, Adv.

The court emphasized the necessity of granting a party an opportunity to present its case when absence is justified, reinforcing principles of fairness in legal proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 9 Rule 7 - Petition for setting aside ex parte proceedings - The defendant sought to set aside orders initiating ex parte proceedings due to absence on the hearing date, citing bona fide reasons. The court allowed the petition in the interest of justice, setting aside previous orders and granting an opportunity to file a written statement upon payment of costs. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Interest of Justice - The court emphasized the importance of allowing parties to present their case, particularly when absence is justified. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance and declaration of nullity against the defendants, leading to ex parte proceedings due to the defendant's absence.

Findings of Court:
The court found merit in the defendant's request and set aside earlier orders, allowing a chance to file a written statement.

Issues: The main issue was whether the defendant's absence warranted setting aside the ex parte orders.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence was bona fide and emphasized the necessity of allowing the defendant an opportunity to present their defense in the interest of justice.

Result: Petition allowed.

Order :

1. This civil writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-defendant No. 6 (for short ‘the defendant’) against the order dated 14.07.2023 passed by Additional Civil Judge No. 2, Sikar in civil suit No. 36/2017, whereby the application filed by the defendant Nos.5 and 6 under Order 9 Rule 7 read with Section 151 CPC has been dismissed which was filed against the order dated 02.11.2018 passed by trial court, whereby exparte proceedings were initiated against defendant Nos. 5 and 6.

2. Learned counsel for the defendant submits that the respondent No. 1-plaintiff (for short ‘the plaintiff’) filed a civil suit against the defendants for specific performance of the agreement dated 24.07.1999 and declaration of patta No.4842 dated 12.02.2013 as null and void etc. and permanent injunction, in which due to unavoidable reasons, defendant could not appear before the trial Court on 02.11.2018. As a result of which, ex parte proceedings were initiated against him. After that, on 12.09.2019 defendant filed an application under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC before the trial court but the trial court vide order dated 14.07.2023 dis- missed the application filed by the defendant. He further submits that absence of the defendant was bona fide. Therefore, in the in- terest of justice, the impugned orders dated 02.11.2018 and 14.07.2023 passed by the trial court be set aside and one more opportunity be granted to the defendant to file the written statement before the trial court.

3. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the defendant and perused the impugned orders.

4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of Justice, I deem it fit to allow the petition filed by the defendant on cost.

5. Accordingly, petition filed by the defendant is allowed. The orders dated 14.07.2023 and 02.11.2018 passed by the trial Court are set aside. The trial court is directed to grant only one opportunity to the defendant to file the written statement, subject to payment of cost of Rs.25,000/- by the defendant to the plaintiff on or before next date of hearing, failing which no opportunity shall be granted by the trial Court to the defendant for filing the written statement.

6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top