SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1089

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
EKRAMUDEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Ashok Khilery, Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, DyGa

Order

1. The instant criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 528 of the BNSS has been preferred seeking a direction for the respondents to defreeze the bank accounts of the petitioners.

2. The facts of the case are that alleging certain fraudulent transactions, three bank accounts of the petitioners have been freezed under the instructions of different Cyber Crime Police Stations, details of which are provided hereinunder :-

S. No.Name of the BankAccount NumberPolice Station which directed for freezing
1.HDFC Bank, Bilara Branch50200075726642P.S. Rohini Cyber, Delhi
2.HDFC Bank, Bilara Branch50200075726642P.S. Surat Cyber Crime, Gujarat
3.SBI Bank, Pipar City Branch40065025284P.S. Surat Cyber Crime, Gujarat
4.Axis Bank, Pipar City Branch922010005717669P.S. Surat Cyber Crime, Gujarat

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not indulged in any kind of fraudulent activity. The bank accounts freezed under the instructions of the cyber police stations directly relates to the livelihood of the petitioners and they are facing great hardship and inconvenience due to the same. He further submits that even though only a certain amount is said to be disputed, f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top