SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1105

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Sudesh Bansal, J
SMT. ANITA W/O LATE MEETHU LAL RAIGAR – Appellant
Versus
DINESH KUMAR S/O PRABHU LAL – Respondent
CW / 17206 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Vijay Mathur

The Tribunal's discretion in allowing evidence is upheld, and a lack of sufficient reasons for delay in production of witness does not constitute a jurisdictional error.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 227 - Writ petition challenging order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissing application to produce eye witness - The Tribunal dismissed the application due to lack of sufficient reasons for non-production of the witness - The court found no perversity or jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's exercise of discretion. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Evidence - The importance of timely production of evidence in claims proceedings is emphasized, and the discretion of the Tribunal to allow or deny such production is upheld. (Paras 3-5)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners filed a writ petition against the dismissal of their application to produce an eye witness after the closure of evidence in a claim petition filed on 04.01.2020. The Tribunal had previously allowed ample opportunities for evidence but found no justification for the delay in producing the witness.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal's order was justified, and the court chose not to interfere with it, allowing the petitioners to seek production of the witness at the appellate stage if necessary.

Issues: The main issue was whether the Tribunal erred in dismissing the application to produce the eye witness due to the petitioners' failure to provide sufficient reasons for the delay.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Tribunal acted within its discretionary powers and found no jurisdictional error in the dismissal of the application.

Result: Writ petition disposed of.

Order :

1. Petitioners have filed instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , impugning the order dated 07.08.2024, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.2, Kekari, District Ajmer in case No.327/2022(11/20), dismissing applicants’ application to produce eye witness Rajender Singh. 2. Heard counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.

3. It is undisputed fact that the claim petition was filed by the petitioners way back on 04.01.2020 and the claimants have been given ample opportunities to adduce their evidence from 09.06.2022 to 03.05.2023. During this period, on behalf of claimants, claimant-petitioner No.1 Anita has got her statement recorded and subsequently, the evidence was closed. After closure of claimants’ evidence, the claim petition is pending for final hearing and at that stage, claimant moved an application to produce the witness Rajendra Singh, which has been dismissed by the Tribunal by order impugned.

4. Petitioners/ claimants were willing to produce their material witness Rajendra Singh being an eye witness, but no sufficient reasons have been assigned by the claimants for not producing him.

5. The Tribunal has assigned justified reasons and has dismissed the application in exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction, which do not suffer from any perversity or jurisdictional error.

6. This Court, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction, enshrined under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , is not inclined to interfere with the order impugned, however, it is open for the petitioner to make a prayer to produce the witness Rajendra Singh at the appellate stage, in case, their claim petition is dismissed on account of non-production of eye witness Rajendra Singh.

7. With aforesaid liberty, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

8. Any other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top